251207

Akkad Daily uploaded a video today that transported me to the point that I'm about to make which
connects frustrations I had/have with Ben and the greater, more universal (young) male agony. His
video was a discussion on a tabloid-esque publication which includes 'Far right' and 'dating' and
'here's what she had to say about it' in the headline. Essentially a woman dated men she categorizes
as "far-right" politically for a period of one year, and is bequeathing her experiences to the
general public. She put these men down capably, there is a pretextual condemnation of their ideology,
and she plays their formations off as mis-or easily-led men discovering affirmment in dialogues
with other frustrated men (as if that is a bad thing) - her prescription for their atrophies being
therapy. Yeah right, as if a therapist is going to entertain your "silly" extreme ideas, or even
possess a baseline of respect for you, a vulnerable male, submitting yourself to the effeminate
institution of complaining to an agent of averageness (reference embedded), or rather, a commercial
pathological engineer who sells notyou a narrative which they will emerge satisfied with. I've long
been disgusted with the idea of female empowerment, as its something which I feel there is, in the
present, no reciprocal for at men's disposal. I feel that 'empowering' anyone is inherently hazardous
as the implied purpose for this reinforcement to their confidence is to enable whatever was subdued
by the architectures and atmospheres of existence - to empower me would be to motivate me to become
physically fit. The inhibitions which get in my way to this are my internal disinterest and what I
feel to be a healthy rejection of what is desired of me. If I've been enlightened to the superficial
deitification of appearance (contrary to what Black Phillip told us) by womankind as a metric of
the most fundamental appraisals of worth, then I should be and am happy to defy their standard.
Of course I don't stop with just being comfortable (not confident perse) about my visual presentation,
I also issue rebukes to their ways and ideas in the online forum, something I have a constitutional
right to. To empower a woman is to.. make them resolute in being deplorable beneficiaries to an
unnatural system. Women already possess inherent value in that their presences add value to men and thusly
themselves and in that they fulfill/render possible the furtherence of family- something that is not
coded one way or the other sexually (men and women alike feel the call of this biological imperative).
So, as Carl Benjamin (@sargonofakkad) has posited countless times and as a result of the saliency of
his positions I am beginning to - what is so unfair about a life of motherhood and domestic unity?
I find that there isn't any unfairness - it is the disingenuous framing of this as being something
which depersons and servilizes when it is simply what results in women possessing the same partition
of 'godly' (instilled) potentials to purpose and content as men. What I am convinced the destruction
of the concepts of men and women that adhere to the fading customs achieves is the displacement of
average and lower men entirely (as well as low women), commodification of well-scoring men and women,
and the transformation of a world that is arranged by classes and families into some libido-entrepreneurial
gameshow (like the disgusting "Squid Game" or "The Running Man"- its an equally cruel and clever joke
that the populus devours these once psychological indictments of society, as Hollywood has hijacked
the institutions and replaced the bitter ingredients with sugar; sex and violence). I am disconcerted
by the popularity of these adulterated IPs, and the embrace of the dystopia setting in. My instrument
of rebellion is racism, a deliberate bittering agent to tarnish the flavor of the particular cupped
handful of tiny male lives that are routinely smashed into the mouths of the proportional female
ogres.