260214c;
Beginning the convention of putting 'c' on the notes - it stems from my entries at work having
followed 26XXXXa and 26XXXXb for master and auxilliary workstations. And entries done at home
share the same program for their composition, Notepad - my second job at Tech Experts has me
opting for handwritten entries, so these are less traceable. They might be organized in the
'scans' directory inside the 'images' directory, but the alphanumeric titling doesn't necessarily
work unless it would be implemented after-the-fact as a serialization. 'hw' would make sense,
for 'handwritten'. Considering perhaps the necessity of distinguishing between the personal
handwritten entries, which would very nearly all be done on yellow paper pads, and the ones for
Tech Experts, which it appears will very nearly entirely be done on college ruled composition
notebook paper.

Precipitous thoughts (PT);

Mono or Stereo as a default for computers woven into the studio infrastructure?
Giving it thought, it seems an elegant solution is to have the preferences, if even configurable,
be 'stereo' in the software portion, and the audio from the soundcard will be addressed to
a keystone 3.5mm TRS (35mmtrsfc/35mmtrsfc35mmtrsf) coupler, from which a 3.5mm TRS male to 2x
3.5mm TS female Y-cable (35mmtrsmy35mmtsf35mmtsf) is attached and at what level individual mono
resources are accessible and re-bindable via devices of the submixer variety of articles.

Turn-key ethos;
I crave a personal future where I can have the luxury of turnkeying elements of the studio
environment by way of environmental optimization; perhaps wireframing a work area with shelves,
and housing equipment in a standardized rack capacity, and each of these uniform blocks of say
10 - 16 units of real estate can be inducted with ease and ejected with ease, leveraging a
culture of sealing the rear (no cabling passing through the rear) and addressing ALL of the
connections of the contained equipment in one, two, or three units space allocated to articles
of the panel mount or patchbay variety. The current existence continues to be, despite the
consistent investment of money and thought and self-disciplining, of a midly torturous quality.
I have made many things more organized than I had been operating with at previous points, and
surely, in select ways, moreso than people of similar hobby inclinations or professionals of old,
but - regrettably, while not consciously waved past, attributes of my setup are nearly horrifically
cumbersome. I've paid attention to ergonomics, but in achieving idyllic placements for some
things, I've denigrated the accessibility of others. This makes me want to have a document of
revisions which grades the practicality of each of the regions of consideration and use satisfaction,
but I'll probably settle for recollection for this.

Metal shelf-based setup, closed back.
Potential for mounting couplers at the rear for reduced-clutter patch interface.

Metal corner shelf-based setup, cylindrical.
Wires would converge at the center.


Roundabout audio concept;
Think about the dilemma when you have audio routed around in a circle, with points of exit
(bose speaker, headphones1, headphones2, patchbay). The question is whether, with four cables
perhaps, if a consequential patch adjustment can be made at any point and the resources are
still 'there' at every other place.

Resolution to always update 'start2';
This resource is a lifeline. I am thinking about ways to make it more immediately useful;
a large flat panel screen with wireless receiver keyboards in crucial points of situatedness
comes to mind, as a larger screen is visible from most points, and the multiple wireless keyboards
on tap (preferably with trackpad built into it) would make engaging with the webpage, i.e.
hovering mouse over an attribute to see the hidden locational/spec information or typing into
a yet-implemented searchbar to see a queried log of all occurences of a string, as easy as it
could be.