Sargon does a great job, in my opinion, of conscientiously saying "normal" things, posing rhetorical questions and
making observations that typical people do, but in a pointed, demonstrative way. The bit where he acknowledged that
a common retort against criticisms of the questionable esthetics practices is that they're "not doing it for men"
speaks to real-world (or direct communications with those holding contrary opinion) experience with debate as its
predictive and disarming. Sequencing of these preliminaries is paramount to disabling the exhaustive, often mentally
gymnastic thought death loops where it is asserted that only the opinions of the affected hold legitimate viewpoints
and that you, a non-affected individual, possess no credentials or rights to critique, and Sargon did - with the
explicit intent or not - defuse in real time, akin to a confrontation, these common anticritical scripts.

I find his addressing of women to be refreshing as many thinkers, video essayists and so on have forfeited most
externally-ambitious communiques and their works/pieces now are solely oriented around internal perspective;
bolstering comrades to the shared ideology, not attempting to reach out to slightly off-reservation uncontacted
tribesmen and women. Sargon differentiates and it imbues a bit of starpower as I could imagine someone of the
opposite viewpoint, placed in front of the video, having their pop-up quips quickly minimized by the structuring
of his conversational topic dissections/explorations. Addressing 'women' as a group is a particularly futile(feeling)
gesture as their cohort, bibbed by the privilege and inflation of self and percieved externally-derived worth,
mock such attempts whenever convenient, but his attempt feels earnest and I commend it as it is a good faith
effort, unlike some of mine which have admittedly pursued a more counterinflammatory effect.